RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03517
XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 20 Apr 13, be changed from Unsatisfactory to Satisfactory in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She sent medical documentation to her medical unit prior to the contested FA that should have exempted her from components of the assessment. However, her medical unit never properly processed the documentation. Therefore, her medical condition and the lack of exemptions precluded her from passing the FA.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a note from her medical provider, a Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance, and two AF Forms 469.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).
On 19 Apr 13, the applicant provided a Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance signed by her medical provider and indicating that she was medically cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal circumference (AC) component. Additionally the memorandum exempted her from the push-up and sit-up components of the FA.
On 20 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA, attaining an overall composite score of 17.60, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment. The applicant was credited with the following component scores: Cardio (1-Mile Walk) Incomplete/0.00, Abdominal Circumference 32/17.60 points, Push-ups - Exempt, Sit-ups Exempt.
The applicant provided an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 5 May 13, but in an administrative note was effective as of 19 Apr 13. The form indicated that she was medical cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal circumference (AC) component. Additionally, the form exempted her from the push-up and sit-up component of the FA.
On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was considered by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FAAB denied her request and stated, the applicant did not complete the walk test, and did not provide documentation as to why they [sic] did not finish the test.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial since the applicant did not provide a commander invalidation memorandum requesting the Unsatisfactory score be changed to Satisfactory.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While the applicant has provided medical records confirming a medical condition, she has not met her burden of proving how this condition precluded her from successfully completing the contested FA. In this respect, we note the Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance signed by her medical provider and indicating that she was medically cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal circumference (AC) component. Additionally, we recognize the updated AF Form 469; however, both documents indicate the same limitations and do not provide evidence to support an error with the components she participated in during the contested FA. Moreover, the applicants submission does not contain a letter from her commander requesting the FA be changed to satisfactory or invalidated. Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider her request. However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03517 in Executive Session on 24 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXX, Chair
XXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Jun 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 May 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03162
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Component Rating 11 Jun 13 Exempt Exempt Exempt all four categories *29 May 13 0.0 36.00/0.00 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 29 Oct 12 85.50 32.50/17.10 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 23 Apr 12 100.00 31.00/20.00 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 31 Oct 11 79.50 33.50/15.90 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279
On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02337 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Dec 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of her appeal she submits an AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 11 Mar 13, indicating she...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833
After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714
He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04717
A list of the applicants last 5 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating *22 Jul 13 18.88 35/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Mar 13 59.63 38/47.70 Unsatisfactory 10 Sep 12 79.78 39/49.80 Satisfactory 24 Feb 12 78.33 41/47.20 Satisfactory 19 Aug 11 86.00 44/52.40 Satisfactory *Contested FA An AF Form 108, dated 4 Sep 13, signed by his medical provider, states the member has been evaluated and has a medical condition precluding the achievement of a passing score. On 20 Feb 14, a similar...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05443 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a Medical Determination letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01643
IAW AFI 36-2905, Para 2.10.4 Members with a duty limiting condition (DLC) prohibiting them from performing one or more components of the FA will have a composite score calculated on the assessed components. On 14 Aug 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and was tested on the sit-up, push-up and AC components of the test. IAW AFI 36-2905; Attach 1, para 10, If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results; and para...